Thursday, January 15, 2015

Response to "Strong is the Silence: Challenging Interlocking Systems of Privilege and Oppression in Mathematics Teacher Education"


The article I read titled, “Strong is the Silence: Challenging Interlocking Systems of
Privilege and Oppression in Mathematics Teacher Education” states that “it is time to consider math teacher educators’ (MTE) knowledge and practice—their preparation and their research agendas, frameworks, approaches, and strategies for action toward equity in relation to the interlocking systems of privilege and oppression within which they (we) operate.”  The authors propose that MTEs should do this by 1.) looking at diverse schools and relatively homogeneous teaching populations, 2.) focusing also on mathematics teacher educators to create systems of equitable work, and 3.) understanding oppression and privilege as interlocking systems.

This article mentioned how schools in the United States are 90% White and that 43% of K-12 students are of color.  It said that White teachers state that they claim a color-blindness approach.  This bit of information made me really question myself.  If I were to answer honestly, I would claim that I too take the color-blindness approach.  But what is the alternative to this?  Is it to say that we see color or that we acknowledge that we have a diverse classroom?  As a white female, I do not know the alternative route to take in terms of a color-blindness approach or noncolor-blindness approach. 

The article also stated “it is well-documented that teachers hold lower expectations for students of color and those from poor families than they do for White middle class students”.  I do not believe that I am a teacher that has lower expectations for students of color and from poor families, but is this too something that I am unaware of doing?  I felt like the article was trying to say that White teachers are unaware of doing this, and yet it happens.  So am I one of the teachers who fall into this category?  And how do you fix the problem of holding lower expectations for different groups of students if you are unaware of doing it?

2 comments:

  1. I appreciate your insight as a teacher and have to say I'm a little surprised by this. The last quote particularly strikes me. If teacher's are holding lower expectations for teachers of color, doesn't that contradict the statement of teacher's claiming color-blindness? I think there is a point to be made about teacher's worrying about a student's situation at home versus a student's ability. I would hope that it isn't the case that teacher's worrying student's ability simply because they are of color. Perhaps there is a worry about the situation at home? It is concerning that there isn't a way to address the issue of holding lower expectations if you are unaware of holding them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not sure if the paper you read talked about this in light of standardized testing, but it brings a new dimension into the conversation; In our K-12 system, do we value a set amount of knowledge that allows us to compare and contrast knowledge without regard to individual situations and learning styles?

    ReplyDelete